Nutrition and heat stress - how do they interact?
By Luke Collopy, BSc (Hons)6 Minute Read
6 Minute Read
As winter training blocks come to an end and all the hard miles are complete, the physiology is built, race pace is second nature and the nutrition strategy is dialled. Everything points towards a perfect race and a new PB… right?
Not always.
For many endurance athletes, one major factor can completely derail their race: HEAT.
When temperatures exceed 15°C, the heat begins to play a part (Ely et al., 2007). Race pace which once felt “comfortably hard” can become unsustainable, turning into a battle for survival.
The reality is that heat alters more than just comfort during a race, it alters cardiovascular function, carbohydrate tolerance and hydration requirements.
Even the best athletes can suffer when heat exposes the gap between fitness and being environmentally prepared.
When exercising in the heat, the body's primary focus is thermoregulation (i.e. keeping itself cool!).
Whilst this cooling response is essential, it comes at a large physiological cost - especially in unacclimatised athletes:
Perhaps the most frustrating aspect for athletes, is the disparity between pace and effort. In extremely hot conditions, perceived effort drastically increases, whilst pace stays the same and often drops.
Underestimating the heat can not only cost you your race but, in extreme cases, your health.
Despite spending months building robust physiology to withstand the demands of race day, some athletes still arrive under-prepared for the environmental conditions.
One of the main reasons for this is: training blocks/camps are often completed over winter and/or spring months where conditions are significantly cooler. Whilst athletes have developed the capacity to perform, they lack exposure to the thermal stress needed to be prepared to race when unpredictable conditions lead to a hot race day.
For recreational athletes this problem is often compounded further. Accessibility to environmental chambers, warm weather training camps and controlled heat acclimation strategies is often limited.
Nutrition strategies also become vulnerable in the heat. Fuelling plans practiced in cooler temperatures react poorly to heat, altering fluid requirements, gut tolerance, and overall demand for carbohydrates.
As a result, many athletes may exhibit excellent fitness, appearing primed and ready to race, but poor tolerance to thermal stress ultimately unravels race execution.
One of the largest problems athletes experience in the heat is simply consuming enough fuel for their engine.
As temperatures rise, the body prioritises thermoregulation over digestion.Two things happen: initially the body suppresses hunger through hormonal changes to devote more energy to staying cool. Parallel to this, redistribution of blood to promote skin blood flow for cooling reduces blood flow to the gut.
As a result, the gut’s ability to absorb carbohydrates is reduced. Often leading to:
This creates a dangerous physiological mismatch. Whilst carbohydrate demand increases significantly in the heat, appetite and gut tolerance are simultaneously reduced.
As a result, athletes may begin underfuelling early into endurance events, not fully understanding the consequences. Whilst short term underfuelling may help relieve gut symptoms, the long term performance consequences are often catastrophic.
The combination between reduced carbohydrate intake and depleted glycogen stores leads to the rapid onset of fatigue later in the race - often where energy demands to make a race-defining move are highest. This is typically the moment where a race plan collapses and an athlete may experience "hitting the wall”.
Paradoxically, while exercise in the heat reduces carbohydrate absorption in the gut, hot conditions also substantially increase the energy that the body burns during exercise , whilst shifting to favour carbohydrates for energy production (Burke, 2004). Practically, this means that muscle glycogen stores deplete more rapidly in hot conditions.
In turn, athletes' reliance on exogenous carbohydrate provision (i.e. the carbohydrate they are consuming during the race in the form of gels, bars, drink mixes etc.) is increased to sustain race pace.
Simple, right? In hot conditions, take on more fuel?
Unfortunately not. Whilst the body cries out for more carbohydrates, emerging evidence indicates that hot conditions can reduce your ability to use what you consume by up to 20% (Moucin et al., 2025).
The practical implications of this are important - athletes' engines typically require more fuel in the heat, however, their engine is less efficient in using this fuel, tolerating much less.
The challenge is, athletes are stuck between fuelling for increased carbohydrate demands, whilst simultaneously managing a gut and digestive system under heightened physiological stress.
For this reason, it is essential that athletes not only design an appropriate fuelling strategy for hot conditions, but also rigorously test this in conditions which replicate the intensity and environmental demands of race day.
Initial increases in sweat rate allow the body to effectively cool itself, offloading heat and preventing dangerous rises in core temperature. However as exercise progresses, significant fluid loss decreases sweat rate and the body’s ability to stay cool becomes less effective.
As a result of fluid loss, blood plasma volume declines, substantially increasing cardiovascular strain, meaning the heart must work harder to maintain oxygen delivery to the working muscles (Thomas, Erdman, Burke, 2016). Consequently, even relatively small levels of dehydration (>2%) lead to rapid elevations in heart rate and markedly compromised aerobic capacity, increasing the relative effort of race pace (Cheuvront and Knefick, 2014).
Alongside fluid loss, substantial variability in sodium loss adds to the complex problem of hydration. Sweat sodium concentrations can range from 200-2000mg/L, with the ‘saltiest’ sweaters losing an incredible amount of sodium over the course of a multi-hour endurance event (Baker, 2017).
Interestingly, sodium loss doesn't always align with fluid loss. Two athletes with a very similar sodium loss may exhibit vastly different sweat rates (between 0.3-2.4 L/h), as a result of training status, relative work rate and environmental conditions (temperature and humidity).
For this reason the most effective hydration strategies are individualised and informed through lab testing.
Whilst hydrating poorly can pose severe dehydration risks, overhydration is a real and dangerous possibility too. When fluid intake exceeds fluid loss, combined with poor sodium replacement, blood sodium concentration can become dangerously diluted (<135mmol/L). Exercise-induced hyponatremia is the result, leading to a breakdown in race performance and often serious health consequences.
As such, it is important to replace a sensible proportion of total fluid loss and, if unsure, seek the advice of a performance nutritionist to help you tailor an individualised hydration strategy.
Successfully racing in the heat requires careful management of hydration, carbohydrate availability and thermoregulation to prevent physiological strain seriously compromising performance.
Ultimately, race day nutrition and hydration strategies should be highly individualised in hot conditions. Sweat rate, sweat sodium concentration and fuelling tolerance can all vary drastically between athletes.
In addition to a well-designed nutrition, pacing and cooling strategy, regular heat exposure over a prolonged period of time is typically more effective than one extreme ‘hero’ session in producing meaningful adaptations.
*If choosing to undertake any of the above strategies, do be mindful of your hydration, practicing the hydration advice mentioned above.
The athletes who perform best in the heat are not always the fittest, but the most prepared. Racing in hot conditions requires more than fitness, generic recommendations are insufficient and can cost you your race. When environmental stress is ignored, physiology eventually wins.
Therefore, evidence informed strategies built from lab based testing, with 1-to-1 practitioner support are key to building a personalised fuelling, hydration and cooling strategy - ensuring the heat doesn’t cost you that PB or your race.
Baker, L. B. (2017). Sweating rate and sweat sodium concentration in athletes: A review of methodology and intra/interindividual variability. Sports Medicine, 47(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0691-5
Burke, L. M. (2001). Nutritional needs for exercise in the heat. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 128(4), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(01)00279-3
Cheuvront, S. N., & Kenefick, R. W. (2014). Dehydration: Physiology, assessment, and performance effects. Comprehensive Physiology, 4(1), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c130017
Ely, M. R., Cheuvront, S. N., Roberts, W. O., & Montain, S. J. (2007). Impact of weather on marathon-running performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 39(3), 487–493. doi.org
Mogin, L., Witard, O. C., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2025). Heat stress impairs exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during prolonged running when maintaining euhydration. Journal of Applied Physiology, 138(5). doi.org
Racinais, S., Alonso, J. M., Coutts, A. J., Flouris, A. D., Girard, O., Gonzalez-Alonso, J., Hausswirth, C., Jay, O., Lee, J. K., Mitchell, N., Nassis, G. P., Nybo, L., Pluim, B. M., Roelands, B., Sawka, M. N., Takahashi, K., Periard, J. D., & Pitsiladis, Y. P. (2015). Consensus recommendations on training and competing in the heat. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(18), 1164–1173. doi.org
Sawka, M. N., Burke, L. M., Eichner, E. R., Maughan, R. J., Montain, S. J., & Stachenfeld, N. S. (2007). American College of Sports Medicine position stand: Exercise and fluid replacement. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 39(2), 377–390. doi.org
Thomas, D. T., Erdman, K. A., & Burke, L. M. (2016). American College of Sports Medicine joint position statement: Nutrition and athletic performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(3), 543–568. doi.org
The Edge HPL is not responsible for any specific health or allergy needs that require supervision nor any adverse reactions you may have to the advice we provide - whether you have followed them as written or have modified them to suit your dietary requirements.
Any nutritional advice and information provided by The Edge HPL is based on our own experiences, research and knowledge. The information provided is not to be used in place of proper medical advice. The Edge HPL and its employees and representatives are not medical professionals, do not hold any type of medical licenses or certifications and do not practice medicine. If customers have any medical questions regarding any advice or information provided by The Edge HPL, they should consult their physician, or another healthcare professional. Please also refer to our Standard Business Terms and Conditions, which can be found on our website.